Design in the technicity of human life: interfaces that shape the human being

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29147/datjournal.v9i2.830

Keywords:

Human-technology interaction, Reality, World, Social impact

Abstract

The interaction between people and the world is mediated by technological devices. It is known that, in this context, the use of technical resources (i.e. the internet) has driven social transformations in the way humans communicate, both imposing new language patterns and changes in socialisation. This article aims to visualise how design can reflect on its implications in the current transformation of human experience through technology. To carry out this examination, an abstract-visual schematisation was drawn up using a narrative bibliographical approach, which is classified as basic, exploratory and qualitative research. The ways in which technological mediation allows design to think about its ontological and epistemological purposes were examined, reflecting the complexity of its theoretical and practical application in the projection of objects, things and artefacts, as well as in the production of meaning, significance, representation and the very question of human experience. Finally, an outline is presented of how the designer fundamentally influences the process of contemporary change in human action, which emphasises the relevance of an expanded approach to the impacts of the activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cássio Henrique Bauer

Master's student in Design at the Postgraduate Program in Design (PPGDesign), Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), in the area of Human Factors in Design, focusing on the Interfaces and Cognitive Interactions line of research. He graduated in Information Science in 2022 from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). Currently, as a student-researcher, I am interested in acting, researching and documenting investigations in the areas of Information, Communication, Media and Technology, through inter-transdisciplinary studies with a focus on carrying out theoretical research. I am also inclined to explore themes from the field of Philosophy, which includes: Philosophy of Technology, Post-Phenomenology, Phenomenology and Phenomenology of Technology. Other topics of interest include Semiotics, Cyberspace and Scientific Method. My research assumptions are based on the ideas of authors such as Martin Heidegger, Albert Borgmann, Don Ihde, Michel Foucault, Charles S. Peirce, Jean Baudrillard, Umberto Eco, Bruno Latour, Marshall McLuhan, Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari, Paul Ricoeur, Gilbert Simondon, Bruno Munari, Lev Manovich, Vilém Flusser and Lucia Santaella. Specifically, my research focuses on the humanization of technology and its technical aspects, as well as philosophical studies of information, technology, and design.

Flávio Anthero Nunes Vianna dos Santos

He has a degree in Industrial Design - Product Design and Graphic Design from ESDI, Escola Superior de Desenho Industrial da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (1992), a master's degree in Production Engineering from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (1998) and a doctorate in Production Engineering from Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2005). He is currently a member of the Editorial Board of Revista Hall Ceart (UDESC) and Revista Human Factors in Design (PPGDESIGN/UDESC), a lecturer and researcher at UDESC - Santa Catarina State University, as well as an ad hoc evaluator for INEP/BASis, the CEE/SC State Education Council and an ad hoc consultant for CNPq. Furthermore, he has experience in Industrial Design: teaching and research in design, design management, project methodology and human factors.

References

ACCIOLY, M. I. A simulação na era da convergência digital. Razón y Palabra, v. 11, p. 53, 2006.

AKTAŞ, B. M. et al. Human-thing relations in design: a framework based on postphenomenology and material engagement theory. Metu Journal Of The Faculty Of Architecture, [S.L.], v. 39, n. 1, p. 57-76, 28 mar. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2022.1.3

ALÃO, R. S. D. Sobre a complexidade dos problemas contemporâneos de design. DAT Journal, [S.L.], v. 5, n. 4, p. 24-40, 8 dez. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v5i4.280

BARROS, C. B. F.; MACHADO, L. M. A. (Re)inventando futuros possíveis: design crítico e especulativo. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO EM DESIGN, 13., 2018, Joinville. Anais [...]. Joinville: Univille, 2018. p. 1-10.

BAUDRILLARD, J. Simulacro e simulação. Lisboa: Relógio D´Água, 1991.

BAUDRILLARD, J. Towards a theory of consumption. In: BAUDRILLARD, J. The consumer society: myths and structures. 3. ed. Londres: SAGE, 2017. Cap. 7. p. 114-191.

BECCARI, M. O imaginário do design: ensaio filosófico sobre os discursos do design. Revista Poliedro, Pelotas, Brasil, v. 1, n. 01, p. 065–083, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15536/2594-4398.2017.v1.n01.pp.65-83

BECCARI, M. et al. Seis eixos para uma filosofia do design. Estudos em Design, Rio de Janeiro, v. 25, n. 1, p. 13-32, 2017.

BECCARI, M. N.; OLIVEIRA, T. L. A philosophical approach about user experience methodology. In: MARCUS, A. (Ed.). Design, user experience, and usability: theory, methods, tools and practice. Berkeley, Springer, 2011. p. 13-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21675-6_2

BIANCHIN, M. How can consciousness be false? Alienation, simulation, and mental ownership. Philosophy & Social Criticism, [S.L.], v. 49, n. 6, p. 650-671, 10 out. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537221131578

BRAGA, J. L. O grau zero da comunicação. E-Compós, [S. l.], v. 18, n. 2, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30962/ec.1161

CASTELLS, M. A rede e o ser. In: CASTELLS, M. A sociedade em rede. 6. ed. São Paulo, Paz e Terra, 2011. p. 39-66. Prólogo.

DELEUZE, G. Diferença e repetição. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Graal, 2006.

EGGINK, W.; DORRESTIJN, S. Philosophy of technology x design: the practical turn. In: DESIGN RESEARCH SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 9., 2018, Limerick. Anais [...]. Limerick: DRS, 2018. p. 191-201.

FALLMAN, D. Persuade into what? Why human-computer interaction needs a philosophy of technology. In: CONFERENCE ON PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2., 2007, Palo Alto. Anais [...]. Palo Alto: PERSUASIVE, 2007. p. 265-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_35

FLUSSER, V. O mundo codificado: por uma filosofia do design e da comunicação. São Paulo: Ubu Editora, 2007.

FLUSSER, V. The shape of things: a philosophy of design. Londres: Reaktion Books, 1999.

FUCHSBERGER, V.; FRAUENBERGER, C. Doing responsibilities in entangled worlds. Human–Computer Interaction, [S.L.], p. 1-24, 30 out. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2023.2269934

HASSE, C. Artefacts that talk: mediating technologies as multistable signs and tools. Subjectivity, [S.L.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 79-100, 19 mar. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.29

IHDE, D. Tecnologia e o mundo da vida: do jardim à terra. Chapecó: Editora UFFS, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788564905610

IHDE, D. The designer fallacy and technological imagination. In: KROES, P. et al (ed.). Philosophy and design: from engineering to architecture. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. Cap. 4. p. 51-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_4

IHDE, D.; MALAFOURIS, L. Homo faber revisited: postphenomenology and material engagement theory. Philosophy & Technology, [S.L.], v. 32, n. 2, p. 195-214, 30 jul. 018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0321-7

KUSSLER, L. M.; LORENZ, B. A. Design como prática crítica e filosófica. Revista de Design, Tecnologia e Sociedade, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 34–47, 2018.

LOVE, T. Constructing a coherent cross-disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs: some philosophical issues. Design Studies, [S.L.], v. 23, n. 3, p. 345-361, maio 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00043-6

LOVE, T. Design as a social process: bodies, brains and social aspects of designing. Journal Of Design Research, [S.L.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2003.009827

LOVE, T. Philosophy of design: a meta-theoretical structure for design theory. Design Studies, [S.L.], v. 21, n. 3, p. 293-313, maio 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00012-5

MANZANARES, R. D. et al. Vilém Flusser e Bruno Latour: duas abordagens à filosofia do design. In: COLÓQUIO INTERNACIONAL DE DESIGN, 4., 2017, Belo Horizonte. Anais [...]. Belo Horizonte: Blucher Design Proceedings, 2017. p. 783-795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5151/cid2017-67

MATURANA, H. A ontologia da realidade. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2014.

MENDES, Y. O papel do design[er] na contemporaneidade: conceitos, construções e ações. conceitos, construções e ações. 2011.

MOURA, C. O desígnio do Design. In: CONGRESSO DA ASSOCIAÇÃO PORTUGUESA DE CIÊNCIAS DA COMUNICAÇÃO, 4., 2005, Aveiro. Anais […]. Aveiro: SOPCOM, 2005. p. 73-81.

PARSONS, G. The philosophy of design. Cambridge: Polity, 2015.

POMBO, M. F. T. A philosophical approach to design: the design of philosophy. Nordes, Norway, v. 3, n. 2, p. 1-3, ago. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21606/nordes.2009.021

REICH, Y.; SUBRAHMANIAN, E. Philosophy of design, science of design, engineering (of) design: what is your choice. Research In Engineering Design, Londres, v. 4, n. 24, p. 321-323, set. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-013-0163-3

ROSENBERGER, R.; VERBEEK, P. P. A field guide to postphenomenology. In: ROSENBERGER, R., VERBEEK, P. P. (ed.). Postphenomenological investigations: essays on human technology relations. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015. Cap. 1. p. 7-42.

SANTAELLA, L. Astúcias do design. Flusser Studies, [S. L.], v. 21, p. 1-10, jun. 2016.

SECOMANDI, F. O artefato irredutível: em busca de novos ideais para o design de interfaces. Ergodesign & HCI, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 28-35, jun. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22570/ergodesignhci.v3i1.24

SILVA, R. A transcendência do design: pequeno fragmento de filosofia do design. Politécnico de Leiria, [S.L.], p. 84-100, 2022.

SMITH, D. W. The concept of the simulacrum: deleuze and the overturning of platonism. Continental Philosophy Review, [S.L.], v. 38, n. 1-2, p. 89-123, 30 abr. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-006-3305-8

SOUZA FILHO, B. A. B.; STRUCHINER, C. J. Uma proposta teórico-metodológica para elaboração de modelos teóricos. Cadernos Saúde Coletiva, [S.L.], v. 29, n. 1, p. 86-97, mar. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462x202129010180

SOUZA LEITE, J. O discurso do design gráfico como polifonia. Estudos em Design, v. 5, n. 1, p. 59-68, 1996.

VERBEEK, P. P. Cyborg intentionality: rethinking the phenomenology of human-technology relations. Phenomenology And The Cognitive Sciences, [S.L.], v. 7, n. 3, p. 387-395, 26 jun. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9099-x

VERBEEK, P. P. What things do: philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271033228

ZWAN, S. D. et al. Philosophy at work: postphenomenology as a generative lens in design research and practice. In: DESIGN RESEARCH SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 1., 2020, [S. L.]. Anais [...]. [S. L.]: Design Research Society, 2020. p. 1691-1706.

Published

2024-09-09

How to Cite

Bauer, C. H., & Santos, F. A. N. V. dos. (2024). Design in the technicity of human life: interfaces that shape the human being. DAT Journal, 9(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.29147/datjournal.v9i2.830