Metodologia da Teoria Fundamentada Construtivista: Um Guia para Explorar as Epistemologias da Filosofia do Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29147/datjournal.v10i3.1096Palavras-chave:
Filosofia, Design, Epistemologia, o Cotidiano, CGTResumo
No contexto da filosofia do design, esta pesquisa destaca os fundamentos e o impacto do modernismo no design e o papel do designer no cotidiano. Argumenta que o design não atende suficientemente aos seus fundamentos modernistas. Através das lentes do cosmopolitismo e da cosmopolítica, a pesquisa explora o cotidiano como uma estrutura para a compreensão do “mundo comum”, onde o design media as interações entre humanos, não humanos e espaços sociais. Com base em insights de Latour, Sloterdijk, Boltanski e Lefebvre, a pesquisa investiga as relações dinâmicas entre pessoas, objetos, política e produção espacial. Além disso, ao se envolver com a filosofia do design de Parsons e Galle, propõe que as experiências cotidianas podem remodelar a epistemologia do design, direcionando-a para abordagens mais centradas no ser humano. Informado pela teoria fundamentada construtivista (TCC), o autor desenvolveu um processo metodológico de cinco etapas, que apoiou a exploração das filosofias do design e do cotidiano como um meio de avançar em direção a uma epistemologia do design adaptada.
Downloads
Referências
AUERNHAMMER, J.; FORD, C. Conference paper in the 13th Design Thinking Research Symposium on What is Design? The Semantic Core and Periphery of Design Definitions, March 22-24, Technicon – Israel Institute of Technology, 2022.
BERMAN, M. All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1982.
BOLTANSKI, L.; CHIAPELLO, E. The New Spirit of Capitalism. Italy: Verso, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-006-9006-9
BOLTANSKI, L.; THÉVENOT, L. The Sociology of Critical Capacity, European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–77. In Silber, I. F. (2003). Pragmatic Sociology as Cultural Sociology: Beyond Repertoire Theory?, European Journal of Social Theory, 6 v4, p.427–449, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/136843199002003010
BRAY, D. Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism: Representation and Leadership in Transnational Democracy. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230342965_8
BRIGHENTI, A. M. Visibility in Social Theory and Social Research. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230282056
CHARMAZ, K. Constructing Grounded Theory. UK: Sage, 2014.
CROSS, N. Designerly Ways of Knowing. NY: Springer, 2006
DE CERTEAU, M. The Practice of Everyday Life. USA: University of California Press, 2011.
DORST, K. Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design. USA: MIT Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10096.001.0001
ESCOBAR, A. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. USA: Duke University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816
FELL, E.; MIRENKOVA, I. V.; ORLOVSKAYA, T. V. Book Review: The Philosophy of Design. By Glenn Parsons, Advanced Access Publication 5th February 2016, p.174-176, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqw005
GALLE, P. Philosophy of Design; an introduction, Centre of Design Research, Denmark Designskole, p.1-6, 2007.
GALLE, P. Candidate worldviews for design theory. Design Studies, 29 v3, p.267-303, 2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.02.001
GALLE, P. Self-Knowledge by Proxy: Parsons on Philosophy of Design and the Modernist Vision, The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2 v4, p.322–342, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.05.001
GARRETT, J. J. The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web and Beyond. USA: New Riders, 2010.
GIOMBINI, L.; KVOKAČKA, A. Everydayness: Contemporary Aesthetic Approaches. Italy: RomaTrE-Press, 2021.
HARVEY, D. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.
HIGHMORE, B. Everyday Life and Cultural Theory: An Introduction. UK: Routledge, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464229
JONES, D.; PLOWRIGHT, P.; BACHMAN, L.; POLDMA, T. Introduction: Design Epistemology. In. The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs, Design Research Society 2016, London, 1, p.295–302, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.619
JULIER, G. Consultant social design, austerity and citizenry. City, analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 2, v6, p.813-821, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1412203
KAUFMANN-BUHLER, J.; PASS, V.R.; WILSON, C.S. Design History Beyond the Canon. 1st ed. UK: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350051614.0006
KENDAL, G.; WOODWARD, I.; SKRBIS, Z. The Sociology of Cosmopolitanism: Globalization, Identity, Culture and Government. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234659
KRIPPENDORFF, K. The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. USA: CRC Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299951
LATOUR, B. On technical mediation, Common Knowledge, 3 v2, p.29-64, 1994.
LATOUR, B. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. USA: Harvard University Press, 2004a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039964
LATOUR, B. Whose Cosmos, Which Cosmopolitics? Comments on the Peace Terms of Ulrich Beck. Common Knowledge, 10 v3, p.450–462, 2004b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-10-3-450
LEFEBVRE, H. Critique of Everyday Life. USA: Verso, 1991a.
LEFEBVRE, H. The Production of Space. UK: Blackwell, 1991b.
LIDWELL, W.; HOLDEN, K.; BUTLER, J. Universal Principles of Design. USA: Rockport Publishers, 2010.
LIGITA, T.; HARVEY, N.; WICKING, K.; NURJANNAH, I.; FRANCIS, K. A practical example of using theoretical sampling throughout a grounded theory study: A methodological paper, Qualitative Research Journal, 20 v1, p.116-126, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-07-2019-0059
LINDQVIST, H.; FORSBERG, C. Constructivist grounded theory and educational research: constructing theories about teachers’ work when analysing relationships between codes, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 46 v2, p.200-2010, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2095998
MARGOLIN, V. The Politics of the Artificial. USA: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
MASSEY, D. Space, Place and Gender. USA: Polity, 2013.
MILLS, J.; BONNER, A.; FRANCIS, K. The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 v1, p.25-35, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500103
NELSON, H. G.; STOLTERMAN, E. The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.): USA. MIT Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9188.001.0001
NIEUWENHUIS, M. Taking Up The Challenge Of Space: New Conceptualisations Of Space In The Work Of Peter Sloterdijk And Graham Harman. Continent, 4 v1, p.16-37, 2014.
NORMAN, D.A. The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books, 2013.
PARSONS, G. The Philosophy of Design. USA: Polity Press, 2016.
POHL, C.; HADORN, G.H. Gestaltungsprinzipien für die Transdisziplinäre Forschung – ein Beitrag destd-net, München: oekom. In: Hadorn, G.H, Hoffmann-Riem, H, Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W, Joye, D, Pohl, C, Wiesmann, U, & Zemp, E. 2008. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. S.I.: Springer, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3
POLDMA, T. The Dynamics of Theory and Practice in Design Learning: Contexts, Service and a Discipline in Evolution, The Journal of Interior Architecture Special Issue - Teooriast praktikani/Dynamics of Theory and Practice, 1, p.92-109, 2015.
RAIZMAN, D. History of Modern Design: Graphics and Products Since the Industrial Revolution. UK: Laurence King Publishing, 2003.
SAUCE, B.; MATZEL, L. D. Inductive Reasoning, Encyclopaedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior, S.I., p.1-8, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1045-1
SAUNDERS, M.; LEWIS, P.; THORNHILL, A. Research Methods for Business Students, (3rd ed). USA: Pearson Education Limited, 2003.
SCHINKEL, W.; NOORDEGRAAF-EELENS, L. In Media Res: Peter Sloterdijk’s Spherological Poetics of Being. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089643292
SCHÖN, D.A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. USA: Ashgate Publishing, 1983.
SLOTERDIJK, P. Critique of Cynical Reasoning. USA: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
SLOTERDIJK, P. Spheres volume I: Bubbles: Microspherology. Germany: Semiotext(e), 2011.
SMIT, B. Atlas.ti. for qualitative data analysis, Perspectives Education, 20 v3, p.65-76, 2002.
STENGERS, I. Cosmopolitics I. USA: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.
STENGERS, I. Cosmopolitics II. USA: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.
UGLANOVA, I.; GIUS, E. The Order of Things: A Study on Topic Modelling of Literary Text. Workshop on Computational Humanities Research, 1(2723), p.57-76, 2020.
WILSON, J. Essentials of Business Research: A Guide to Doing Your Research Project. UK: SAGE Publications, 2010.
YIN, R. K. Qualitative Research From Start to Finish. UK: The Guilford Press, 2011.
ZELECHOWSKA, D.; ZYLUK, N.; URBAŃSKI, M. Find Out A New Method to Study Abductive Reasoning in Empirical Research, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, p.1-11, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920909674
ZHANG, Z. What Is Lived Space?, Ephemera: theory & politics in organization, 6 v2, p.219–223, 2006.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 DAT Journal
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
