Dentro da dislexia: o conhecimento contextual e a metodologia de uma pesquisa guiada pela prática por meio do design tipográfico e da autoetnografia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29147/datjournal.v8i1.699Palavras-chave:
Autoetnografia, Dislexia, Design Gráfico, Desenho Iterativo, TipografiaResumo
Há um interesse crescente na literatura recente sobre o efeito de disfluência em um esforço para contextualizar os resultados da pesquisa de tipografia baseada na legibilidade funcional. Recentemente, um pequeno grupo de pesquisadores tipográficos e de legibilidade começou a pedir mais colaboração para gerar conhecimento útil e prático (Thiessen, Beier & Keage, 2020). Este artigo apresenta um projeto de pesquisa de design conduzido pela prática que utiliza desenho iterativo e arranjos tipográficos por meio de uma abordagem autoetnográfica para transmitir a experiência pessoal com a dislexia. O projeto reflete sobre a questão: como o desenho iterativo e a composição tipográfica podem ser usados para expressar graficamente a experiência subjetiva de aprendizagem disléxica de alguém? Como uma questão secundária que é particularmente focada na prática, é como o projeto pode contribuir para fornecer insights para um público não disléxico da compreensão da palavra e disfluência tipográfica em pessoas com dislexia. A pesquisa é informada por uma variedade de práticas contextuais, profissionais e literatura sobre os estados e condições da experiência disléxica, o uso de adaptação tipográfica e impressão Risograph. O projeto é fundamentado como uma abordagem orientada para a prática, onde a prática criativa e a pesquisa são complementares, mas distintas. A pesquisa é baseada no mundo de preocupação definido pela prática, enquanto o pesquisador praticante está no centro da pesquisa (Vear, 2022). Para eliciar uma perspectiva disléxica, o projeto emprega a autoetnografia como estratégia de coleta e interpretação de evidências por meio de uma ilustração crítica e processo de design tipográfico. A pesquisa contribui para os discursos atuais em áreas como aquelas relacionadas aos princípios tipográficos de dicas visuais e ênfase, bem como outras áreas mais amplas, como como podemos determinar o limite para a disfluência e qual o impacto que as distrações gráficas têm no efeito da disfluência.
Downloads
Referências
Ardern, S. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023) Awakening takes place within: a practice-led research through texture and embodiment. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Bjork, R., & Bjotk, E. (2020). Desirable Difficulties in Theory and Practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9, 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.09.003
Bolt, B. (2012). Heidegger reframed: Interpreting key thinkers for the arts. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bray, J. (2012). Concrete poetry and prose. In The Routledge Companion to Experimental Literature (pp. 314–325). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203116968-30
Brown, R. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Painting the Kitchen Tables: Exploring women's domestic creative spaces through publication design. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Chambers, J. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Second Nature, a Practice-led Design Investigation into Consumerism Responding to Sustainable Home Habits. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Chon, H., & Sim, J. (2019). From design thinking to design knowing: An educational perspective. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 18(2), 187-200.
Csordas, T. J. (1994). Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self (Vol. 2).
Delli Paoli, G. (n.d.). Word and Image. Behance. Retrieved May 26, 2022, from https://www.behance.net/gallery/2978721/Word-and-Image
Descartes, R. (1984). Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy fourth edition.
Draper, C. S. (1971). Guidance is Forever. NAVIGATION, 18(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.1971.tb00073.x
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1991). Towards a Phenomenology of Ethical Expertise. Human Studies, 14(4), 229–250.
Duncan, M. (2004). Autoethnography: Critical appreciation of an emerging art. International journal of qualitative methods, 3(4), 28-39.
Falconer, T. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Grounding: A Practice-led Graphic Exploration of Ecofeminism, Wellbeing and Ecological Consciousness. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Fox, N. J. (2008). Post-positivism. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 2, 659–664.
Hamilton, J., & Jaaniste, L. (2010). A connective model for the practice-led research exegesis: An analysis of content and structure. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 3, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp.3.1.31_1
Heidegger, M. (1962). I
Ho, A. G. (n.d.). Typography today: Emotion recognition in typography.
Thiessen, M., Beier, S., & Keage, H. (2020). A review of the cognitive effects of disfluent typography on functional reading. The Design Journal, 23(5), 797-815.I
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge.
Ings, W. (2011). Managing Heuristics as a Method of Inquiry in Autobiographical Graphic Design Theses. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30, 226–241.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2011.01699.x
Klein, G. (2018). Intuition or experience? Tacit knowledge in decision making. The Business & Management Collection.
Lewis, S. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Less than 5mm — The unseen threat: An investigation into how micro-plastics effect coral reefs. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Li, Q. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Memories from COVID-19: A practice-led research about the lockdown through the perspective of a Chinese student. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Lum, K. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Breakthrough: An illustrated autoethnographic narrative into professional identity and storytelling. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Nesteriuk, S., & Ings, W. (2018). New Thinking & Emerging Thoughts: Practice As Research In Design, Art And Technology. DAT Journal, 3(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v3i2.84
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Basic Writings. Psychology Press.
Michie, K., & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2021). From Shadow: a practice-led design research on academic anxiety. DAT Journal, 6(1), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v6i1.345
Mortensen Steagall, M. (2022). Immersive Photography: a review of the contextual knowledge of a PhD practice-led research project. Revista GEMInIS, 13(2), 73-80. doi:10.53450/2179-1465.rg.2022v13i2p73-80
Mortensen Steagall, M. (2021). Reflections on digital image and contemporaneity. Revista GEMInIS, 12(2), 241-250. doi:10.53450/2179-1465.RG.2021v12i2p241-250
Mortensen Steagall, M. (2020). Conceptual images in advertising: Premises of the advertising image powered by technology and interactivity. Convergencias: Revista de Investigacao e Ensino das Artes, XIII (26).
Mortensen Steagall, M., & Ings, W. (2018). Practice-led doctoral research and the nature of immersive methods / Pesquisa de doutorado practice-led e a natureza dos métodos imersivos. DAT Journal, 3(2), 392-423. doi:10.29147/dat.v3i2.98
Mortensen Steagall, M. (2019). The process of immersive photography: Beyond the cognitive and the physical (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).
Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995641
Mpofu, N., & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2021). Uhlola kweNdebele: Reconnecting Zimbabwe Through Typographic Design. TRANSVERSO, ANO 9, N. 10, AGOSTO 2021ISSN: 2236-4129, 9(10), 8-16.
Munro, A. J. (2011). Autoethnography as a research method in design research at universities. 20/20 Design Vision, 156.
Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014
Pallasmaa, J. (2017). Embodied and existential wisdom in architecture: The thinking hand. Body & Society, 23(1), 96-111.
Polanyi, M., & Sen, A. (2009). The Tacit Dimension. University of Chicago Press.
Pradel, P., Zhu, Z., Bibb, R., & Moultrie, J. (2018). A framework for mapping design for additive manufacturing knowledge for industrial and product design. Journal of Engineering Design, 29(6), 291–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1483011
Rosenberg, T. E. (2008). New beginnings and monstrous births: notes towards an appreciation of ideational drawing.
Ryan, A. B. (2006). Post-Positivist Approaches to Research. In M. Antonesa, H. Fallon, A. B. Ryan, A. Ryan, T. Walsh, & L. Borys (Eds.), Researching and Writing your Thesis: A guide for postgraduate students (pp. 12–26).
Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner, How Professionals Think In Action. Routledge.
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. Allen Lane.
Shan, K. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Forgotten: an autoethnographic exploration of belonging through Graphic Design. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Snowling, M. J. (2019a). Does dyslexia exist? In M. J. Snowling (Ed.), Dyslexia: A Very Short Introduction (p. 0). Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198818304.003.0001
Snowling, M. J. (2019b). What are the cognitive causes of dyslexia? In M. J. Snowling (Ed.), Dyslexia: A Very Short Introduction (p. 0). Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198818304.003.0003
Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008). If It’s Hard to Read, It’s Hard to Do: Processing Fluency Affects Effort Prediction and Motivation. Psychological Science, 19(10), 986–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x
Strachey, E. (1888). Nonsense as a fine art. https://www.abebooks.com/first-edition/Edward-Lear-Nonsense-art-uncommon-original/31365715189/bd
Tantia, J. F. (2020). The Art and Science of Embodied Research Design: Concepts, Methods and Cases. Taylor & Francis Group.
http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/aut/detail.action?docID=6378533
Thiessen, M., Beier, S., & Keage, H. (2020). A Review of the Cognitive Effects of Disfluent Typography on Functional Reading. The Design Journal, 23(5), 797–815.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2020.1810434
van Kampen, S. (2019). An Investigation into Uncovering and Understanding Tacit Knowledge in a First-Year Design Studio Environment. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12171
Van Vliet, D., & Mortensen Steagall, M.. (2020). Duregraph: a study of duration in the post photographic image. DAT Journal, 5(3), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v5i3.234
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. T., & Rosch, E. (1992). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. New Edition.
Vaughan, L. (2017). Practice-based design research. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Vear, C. (2022). The Routledge International Handbook of Practice-Based Research. Routledge.
Vennatrø, R., & Høgseth, H. B. (2021). Craft as More-Than-Human: Practice-led research in a posthumanist perspective. FormAkademisk, 14(2), Article 2.
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4205
Yong, Z. F., Ng, A. L., & Nakayama, Y. (2019). The Dyslexperience: Use of Projection Mapping to Simulate Dyslexia*. 2019 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, 493–495. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340555.3358657
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 DAT Journal
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
