Considerations on digital manufacturing processes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29147/datjournal.v9i3.851

Keywords:

digital fabrication, Design, 3D Modeling, 3D printing, Laser cutting

Abstract

In this article we will present some considerations about digital manufacturing, specifically the 3D printing process and how it relates to the laser cutting process in the context of prototyping. These two processes allow parts and models to be made from comparatively cheap raw materials within product design prototyping. We see these two technologies present in laboratories at design, architecture and engineering universities, making it possible for students to come into contact with this technology very early on in their undergraduate studies. The so-called makerspaces and Fab Labs allow these technologies to be used, making them favorable learning environments. Knowing how to differentiate between the advantages of each process and how to use the most appropriate process to manufacture a piece has become essential in training new designers. We will discuss the differences, advantages and applications of each process in order to engage with the undergraduate design environment to better understand the application and use of these technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Guilherme Menegasso

Mestre em Design com a pesquisa em realidade aumentada e impressão 3D, pela Universidade Anhembi Morumbi. Graduação em Design pelo Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia. Especialidade em modelo físico, impressão 3D e projeto de produto. Curso em UX e UI. Trabalhou entre os anos de 2021 e2023 como tecnico em design no Fab Lab Mauá no Instituto Mauá de tecnologia onde auxiliava em projetos de alunos e professores. Trabalha atualmente como auxiliar de coordenação do curso de Design.

Gilberto Prado

Artista e coordenador do Grupo Poéticas Digitais. Tem realizado e participado de diversas exposições no Brasil e no exterior. Atualmente é professor dos programas em design da Universidade Anhembi Morumbi (UAM) e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Artes Visuais da Escola de Comunicações e Artes da Universidade de São Paulo (ECA-USP).

References

BEYER, Dustin et al. Platener: Low-fidelity fabrication of 3D objects by substituting 3D print with laser-cut plates. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2015. p. 1799-1806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702225

BLIKSTEIN, Paulo. Digital fabrication and ‘making’in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-21, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839423820.203

FLUSSER, Vilém. O Mundo codificado: por uma filosofia do design e da comunicação. 1. ed. São Paulo: Ubu Editora, 2017. 244 p.

PAIO, Alexandra. Desafios digitais na educação do século XXI. A fabricação digital como recurso didático, p. 15-25, 2021.

STRÁSKÝ, Ondřej. Basics of 3D printing with Josef Prusa, primeira edição. Praga. 2019. E-Book. Disponível em:https://www.prusa3d.com/downloads/basics-of-3d-printing.pdf. Acesso em: 20 de março de 2023

KHAN, Wijdan. (2020). Comparison on Performance of Injection Moulding and 3D Printed Parts.

Published

2024-11-21

How to Cite

Menegasso, G., & Prado, G. (2024). Considerations on digital manufacturing processes . DAT Journal, 9(3), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.29147/datjournal.v9i3.851