Deshacer el ser académico
performance crítica e a incerteza na prática do doutorado
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v3i2.93Palabras clave:
Trabalho acadêmico, Metodologias fluídas, Incertezas performativas, Autogestão, Pesquisa práticaResumen
Rumen Rachev ao desestabilizar as convenções emergentes ou a sistematização da pesquisa prática (Buckley e Conomos 2009; Hasman 2006) “desconstrói” seu trabalho intelectual como estudante de doutorado. Rachev, ao invés de seguir a metodologias da pesquisa fluída (Coleman e Ringrose 2013; Koro- -Ljungberg 2016), promove um exame minucioso do que se entende por “produção de conhecimento”, no campo da Arte e do Design. Questionando o papel da crítica no domínio acadêmico e examinando a possibilidade de desfazer o self acadêmico por meio da performance, este artigo fornece uma visão das relações entre crítica institucional e trabalho acadêmico, ao mesmo tempo em que usa a academia como foco principal.
Descargas
Citas
Alberro, A. (2011). Institutions, critique, and institutional critique. In B. Stimson (Ed.), Institutional critique: An anthology of artists writings (pp. 2-19). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Alberro, A., & Stimson, B. (2009). Institutional critique: An anthology of artists writings. Cambridge.
Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (2012). Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts enquiry. London: I.B. Tauris.
Buckley, B., & Conomos J. (eds.). (2009). Rethinking the Contemporary Art School: The Artist, the PhD, and the Academy. Halifax, Nova Scotia: NSCAD Press.
Butt, D. (2017). Artistic research in the future academy. Bristol: Intellect.
Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Deleuze and Research Methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Fraser, A. (2005). From the critique of institutions to an institution of critique. Artforum, 44(1), 100- 106.
Haseman, B. (2006). A Manifesto for Performative Research. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, 118(1), 98-106.
Jervis, I. (2009). Significant method: A questioning of the importance of articulating method in practice-led research (a case-study). Studies in Material Thinking, 3, 1-7.
Keil, M. (2017). What is the purpose of institutional critique today?. Polish Theatre Journal, 1(2).
Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing Qualitative Research: Methodologies without Methodology. London: Sage Edition.
Krauss, R. E. (1986). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Lesage, D. (2012). Permanent Performance. Performance Research, 17(6), 14-21. MA: MIT Press.
Raunig, G., & Ray, G. (2009). Art and contemporary critical practice: Reinventing institutional critique. London: MayFlyBooks. Research to Art and Design. Working Papers in Art and Design, 3.
Scrivener, S. (2000). Reflection in and on action and practice in creative-production doctoral projects in art and design. Working Papers in Art and Design, 1.
Scrivener, S., & Chapman, P. (2004). The Practical Implications of Applying a Theory of Practice-based
